Timeline of John Hoff Oklahoma Law License Application and Results

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Does Anti-Johnny Get Death Threat From Johnny Northside Or Friend Of? You Decide

Comments suggest Johnny Northside aiming for Anti Johnny
 Death threat? Come on, you can't be serious?
Since this blog came online in 2008, it has been a constant thorn in Johnny Northside's side. He has made several requests and even a few demands that it be taken off  the Internet. This post is not about how the first amendment applies to John Hoff but, does not apply to anyone who has factual, public information about him and puts it on the net for anyone to see without having to go searching all over.

This post is more serious. This morning I opened my email and saw there was a comment awaiting moderation to be published. The following is what an anonymous commenter (believed to be John Hoff or one of his close north Minneapolis friends) submitted to this blog on September 28, 2011:

Anonymous said...

why does everyone post anonymously? you must write your own comments just to fill space....or a bunch of rehashed shit that everybody already knows.see you in Coppell in the cross hairs.
September 28, 2011 11:36 AM
I will break down the comment for the readers to understand...

1) They ask why everyone (who submits comments) posts as anonymous? My answer? I have no idea why people post comments the way they do. I have no control over other people.
2) They suggest that I (Anti-Johnny/Jim Watkins) write and submit my own comments to give the impression that this blog has active non-Anti-JNS commenters. All the comments that I have added have all been submitted with my Anti-Johnny Blogger account. Any comment that is submitted by me (even if I was to post as anonymous) are immediately published as Blogger does not require a blog owner to approve their own comments. All other comments are held until I approve them BUT... Blogger sends me an email to let me know I have comments waiting to be approved and a copy of the comments are included in the email. My point is, I got an email notifying me of the death threat comments above... Meaning, someone other than me submitted them. My guess is Johnny Northside or one of his close friends, possibly Megan Goodmundson. After all, Megan does have a prior arrest for assault.
3) Finally the message warns me that they will see me in Coppell (a Dallas suburb) in the "cross hairs." They are claiming that I live in Coppell, Texas and that I should expect to "see" them in their cross hairs which, references the sight that is seen in the scope and mounted onto a rifle. In other words, they have threatened to travel to Coppell and hunt me down with a rifle (I assume with the intention of shooting at me in another attempt to make me stop posting information about John Hoff).

I have stated many times on this blog as well as others that John Hoff and the people he calls his friends are dangerous people and the comments submitted on September 28th, is further proof of that (assuming no one else would want to hunt me down without cause).
Beware NoMi and Afghanistan!

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Johnny Northside Inspires 'First Amendment Appreciation Month'

John Hoff inspired First Amendment Appreciation Month
 Johnny Northside AKA John Hoff has announced on his blog that he will not publish certain comments because, too many trolls have attacked him, his uniform, his house, his tires, his..... You get the idea.
(Note: He never hesitates to attack anyone yet, he has had enough against him.)
The kicker? John didn't just say he won't publish certain 'troll' comments. Nope. John went and put a spin on it that somehow makes his one month ban some sort of American tribute and even called it "virtual national security."
I just think he is a 'virtual' idiot. Just my $0.02 cents.

His post got me thinking and I find it all very ironic. This is the same John Hoff who has stated in public that the "first amendment is under attack" as he refers to his $60,000 loss in court that he has tried to make into a first amendment case. We all know the judge upheld the ruling and just read the previous post for more info on that.
Now John Hoff is showing his respect for the first amendment by RESTRICTING the same rights of others' by not allowing them a voice on his blog! REALLY! Click here to read it yourself.

It is with great pleasure and American pride that the MisAdventures of Johnny Northside blog has the following announcement to make...

For a period of one month, from September 11, 2011 until October 11, 2011, this blog will not attempt to submit a single comment to Johnny Northside's blog AND we hereby make this public plea to all the Johnny Northside 'Trolls' (as he calls commenters he disagrees with) to NOT SUBMIT ANY COMMENTS to his blog during that time.
Rather than submit comments to his anti-first amendment blog, we encourage all people to post the truth about John Hoff to ANY other website as a tribute and appreciation as Americans to the first amendment that I am hereby dubbing "First Amendment Appreciation Month."
I ask anyone who shows their appreciation of the first amendment in honor of John Hoff, to only post things about him that are true.
After all, we don't want to give him a reason to "First Amendment Retaliate" against anyone.
Your comments are welcome here as well as we support the first amendment, unlike Johnny Northside.

Happy John Hoff posting, America! Remember, no comments should be submitted to his blog as we show our respect to his not posting troll comments.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Alexander David Joins MisAdventures of Johnny Northside Blog!

In recent weeks, I have been approached by several people who have expressed an interest in becoming a regular contributor to this blog. Alexander David and I have exchanged many emails and the information about John Hoff that he has compiled, along with a strong desire to share it.... Well, I just want to be the first to say to Alexander, "Welcome to the team!"
In the coming months, this blog will be welcoming several more contributors and I can't wait!

I have the honor of publishing Alexander David's first John Hoff related article! We are happy to have you!


Post by Alexander David

So I’m sure that everyone knows that Minneapolis blogger John W. Hoff was slapped with a $60,000 judgment by a jury for his harassment and infliction of emotional distress on Jerry Moore, who lost his job at the University of Minnesota due to John Hoff’s “working behind the scenes” to force the UofM to fire Moore. Actually, what Hoff did was to “blackmail” the UofM by communicating to them that if they did not fire Moore, he would use his blog to start a negative publicity campaign.

The Fourth Judicial District court judge, Denise Reilly, affirmed the jury verdict after Hoff filed a motion to overturn the verdict. In her ruling she basically stated that Hoff’s actions “behind the scenes” were cause to uphold the verdict. Or in other words, this case is really not a 1st amendment issue; it’s not about what Hoff published in his blog.

Since Judge Reilly’s ruling Hoff has been making all sorts of big talk in his blog about all of his supporters that are going to file “amicus briefs” to support him.

One commenter to Hoff’s “Johnny Northside” blog challenged Hoff to publically state who all his supporters are writing, “You keep mentioning all the lawyers who are filing amicus briefs. Please tell us who is lining up to file amicus briefs for your appeal. As I hear it, after Judge Reilly's opinion, most everyone is walking away. So, please give us names of people and names of organizations that have signed on to file amicus briefs to the Minnesota Court of Appeals on your behalf.”

John Hoff posted a response that is more ridiculous than he claims the question was, “You are being ridiculous. Like I would ever just HAND you that information before it becomes public and give you a tactical advantage.” This response is absolute nonsense and I’ll explain why. But first readers need to know that John Hoff has a law degree, and he knows the process for filing an amicus brief.

In Minnesota, to submit a "friend of the Court brief" known as a brief of amicus curiae, you are required to submit a motion to the Court of Appeals, asking for permission to participate in the case. That motion must be copied to all parties involved, and are public. And those motions must be submitted early on so the COA can approve or deny them based on "why" they want to participate. Or in other words, the COA doesn't want several "friends" submitting briefs on the same point, creating an unnecessary duplication of arguments.

So the reality is that Hoff would not be providing a tactical advantage to anyone by stating who his supporters are, because anyone wanting to submit an amicus brief must announce their intentions early on in the appeals process.

Rather, I would suggest John Hoff’s refusal to provide even a clue as to who his supporters are is an admission that he really has none. As a matter of fact, I submitted a comment to his blog (that he refused to publish – more on that in a moment) telling him that I had information that the attorney who represented him at trial, Paul Godfread, had not yet agreed to represent John Hoff at his appeal. After all, Godfread was retained as a 1st amendment expert attorney by an outside organization. But now that Judge Reilly has quantified that this is not a 1st amendment issue, but about John Hoff being a first class asshole, why would he represent Hoff.

The day after I submitted that comment to Hoff about Godfread not being onboard, he published a blog article announcing that his blog was going to be “troll free”, meaning he was no longer going to publish comments that he didn’t like. And clearly he didn’t like my comment about being abandoned by his attorney. Publishing that comment would be a sign of defeat, and that is not something John Hoff could ever face.

John Hoff is clearly a narcissist, and most likely a sociopath, and when you combine those characteristics you have a very conflicted personality. Someone like that frequently lives in fantasy, and has considerable difficulty facing reality and the truth. In this case John Hoff simply cannot accept the reality that he will be on his own during this appeal. In his fantasy world he thinks he is surrounded by supporters. Yet, after the jury verdict, John Hoff contacted the National Guard and made arrangements to be transferred to a unit that was being deployed to Afghanistan where he is currently stationed. Why? Because he cannot face the jury’s truthful decision that he was wrong, nor can he face the reality that he now owes a judgment of $60,000 plus interest and costs, so he ran away to a neutral location.

And why has he made his blog “troll” free? Because he cannot face the truth, nor can he afford to let comments that state the truth become public and attack his fantasy world. So much like his retreat to Afghanistan, he has put up a wall to his blog so he can retreat into his own little blogging fantasy world where he has stopped bragging about the, “1st amendment trial of the century”, and now blogs a neutral topic about milkshakes in a Thai deli.

The reality is that big bad bully blogger John Hoff is nothing but a coward when faced with the truth. Truth is something he always runs away from. Not a good situation for a soldier fighting in Afghanistan.

Friday, September 2, 2011

Johnny Northside's Previous Military Disability... Or Is He Pulling Our Leg?

The following three images make up the final decision from the Department of Veterans Affairs for John W. Hoff's disability.
I have highlighted several parts which shows John lied to the government, the public or perhaps both.
On page 1, it states Hoff served in the Army until 1994 but, he did not pursue disability compensation until 2003. Why did Hoff wait nine years?
Here are several inconsistencies and contradictions by Hoff:

1) On all 3 pages, the VA states that they have evaluated his injury disability at 20%
2) John said on his blog in 2009 that he is rated at 30% disability, not 20%
3) John said in the same blog post that one leg is "almost two inches shorter than the other"
4) On page 2, the VA stated that at the informal conference both John & his representative
    indicated that he did NOT have a leg length discrepancy

5) On page 3 the VA clearly states that both of Hoff's legs are 39 inches long.
6) Page 2 states that Hoff sent a letter of disagreement and that the VA sent him a letter
    explaining the appeal process. This shows that Hoff appeals anything that goes against him as
    he pushes to get his way.

7) On page 3 the VA grants disability benefits sought on appeal and went on to say that
    "No further appeal action is warranted for this issue."

Click here to read the post on Johnny Northside about his injury

Click on each image to view enlarged.

In July or early August of 2010, John Hoff was allowed to enlist in the US Army National Guard despite "one leg being almost two inches shorter than the other" (as John said on his blog).
Facts that have been gathered about events in John Hoff's past that show how he has lied, contradicted himself, misleads people and appeals court rulings and elections that don't go his way. It is sad to stand by and watch him continue to abuse the public trust when there is documented proof that John Hoff is anything but a stand-up citizen.
As stated before... Informing the public of the true nature and past history about John Hoff is the reason this blog exists.
Thanks for reading.

Post addition:
Here is a quote by John that can be seen by clicking here
"I left the military in the spring of 1994 with my left leg permanently and seriously injured restraining a violent patient who was probably loaded up on PCP. So I ran to enlist in the Army, but I limped out."