Blogger Hoff Lies About Where His Donation Money Was Used

Blogger John Hoff owns Minneapolis' most controversial blog,  The Adventures of Johnny Northside.
One of the main purposes for the Misadventures of Johnny Northside blog is to inform the public about Hoff and his past, current and even future wrongdoings. We have documented several instances where Hoff lied to any number of people who range from everyday people who read his blog up to but, not limited to, the Veteran's Administration and at least one judge.

Hoff's biggest enemy is not me, Jim Watkins (as Hoff has stated). Rather it is himself. He gets caught up in the minor publicity that comes with being sued for getting someone fired and LOSING, resulting in a $60,000 judgement against him. For Hoff to appeal the case, he needed roughly $4000 to file the appeal. It ended up being paid by a free speech group that joined his case as a "friend of the court."

Since March of 2011, which is right after he lost round 1 of the "Trial of the Century" (that too was a name Hoff decided to attach to his case), Hoff's homepage on his blog has been soliciting cash donations to help "defend the first amendment." Below is the copy of his plea for money.

Support The Adventures of Johnny Northside--WE NEED FUNDS TO DEFEND THE FIRST AMENDMENT!

 

What Happens When Banks Sell R.E.O. In Bulk

Image courtesy of Google Images

On November 25, 2011, I sent Ed Kohler an email that was prompted by an article he published about north Minneapolis' housing crash and TJ Waconia on his website The Deets (click to read article).
I didn't want to start a comments battle on his site by submitting my comments so, I sent the email instead.

Even though Ed is "friends" with John Hoff aka Johnny Northside, who was sued for getting someone fired and had a $60,000 judgement slapped on him when he lost (click here to read), I have exchanged several emails with Ed in the past year and have a relationship with him that I would describe as "coordial," even though Ed has not acknowledged the email.

The article mentioned TJ Waconia who owned a lot of houses in north Minneapolis and were accused of driving the values of the area up in a fraudulent way. Since I am former friends with one of the owners of TJ Waconia, I was told how the company acquired their houses in north Minneapolis. Below is a sentence from Ed's article:

The company was involved in a ton of fraudulent real estate transactions where homes were purchased at above their market value and later foreclosed while lots of money was pocketed.

At the sentencing hearing for TJ Waconia, Minneapolis City Council President Barb Johnson lied on the witness stand when she was asked how the city became aware of TJ Waconia and their housing transactions. The following is what Johnson told the court and is a direct quote from the court transcript.

"It was bought to my attention by neighbors, was the increasing uptick in the price of the housing. Neighbors would very carefully watch the paper on Saturday to see if the prices that were being paid for homes that were selling on their block or in their neighborhood, and there was a giant escalation in some of the prices, and neighbors were really, you know, had their eyebrows raised because of it." 

While I actually live in Texas, the foreclosure process after the lender forecloses on a house, is the same in all 50 states. The following is a copy of most of the email that was sent to Ed Kohler, that explains how TJ Waconia bought their houses and why what has been reported about TJ Waconia is not correct and explains how President Barb Johnson lied under oath.

TJ Waconia bought the majority of their houses in north Minneapolis directly from the lenders after they had foreclosed on the property. Otherwise known as REO (Real Estate Owned) properties. The houses were listed on MLS but, the houses were each listed individually, as all other single family residential are. TJ Waconia bought most of their houses from the lenders REO departments but... They bought them in bulk (10-25 houses at a time) AND they bought them using a "blanket loan."



When this happens, the listing on MLS is pulled and because only one loan purchases all of the houses at once, it is not possible to determine how much of the total purchase price went to each individual property.

When a transaction like that takes place, a few things happen:

1- There is no "comp" (comparable) submitted to MLS for appraisers to reference when they appraise a house.
2- When a bank is able to unload 25 houses from their dead-weight books, they sell them at significant discounts. In that time frame, it was common for the overall discount to be from 20% to 40% less than current market rates.
Those two points are the reason I am saying that your sentence in your article is not accurate.

Further, when they sold the houses to the straw buyers, they were selling them at a big profit but, they were only selling the houses for the current market rates.... Not inflating them at all.
Add to that, since the seller (TJ Waconia) sold the houses to the investors (straw buyers) directly, they did not list the houses for sale on MLS. Meaning, they sold the houses FSBO (For Sale By Owner) and those houses do not have comparable's.

There is no way anyone can determine how much TJ Waconia paid for an individual house AND there is no comparable sales record of how much TJ Waconia sold any of the straw buyer houses for but.... The lenders who funded those purchases... They (not TJ Waconia) ordered the appraisals so, if the asking sale price was way over the current market prices... The lenders would not have funded the deals.

The moral to the story: Don't believe everything that the media reports. In this case, ask anyone who is familiar with real estate transactions dealing with REO properties and comparables and they will tell you the same thing.

Johnny Northside Makes Good On Threat...Ends Friendship of 30+ Years

The title may be confusing to some people who are new to this blog. Here is a brief summary of the MisAdventures of Johnny Northside that should help readers understand the meaning of this blog post.

John Hoff aka John Hoffman (pen name used to author, "The Art & Science of Dumpster Diving") aka John Willard Hoff aka Johnny Northside has been engaged in a battle that began in 2007 against the author of this blog, Jim Watkins aka the "Anti-Johnny" (the nick-name was given to me by John Hoff himself).

The battle between us all started when John manipulated the publicity of my best friend, Tom Balko who (at the time) was being slaughtered by the media after the Minneapolis City Council decided that he, his partner Jon Helgason and their company, TJ Waconia were responsible for the increased crime and real estate foreclosure crisis in North Minneapolis.
The city filed a law suit against them that was front page news when it was announced at a press conference by Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak. TJ Waconia was dropped from the law suit after SunTrust Mortgage counter sued after the city was awarded the right to manage the TJ Waconia Houses. The reason SunTrust countered was because, they actually owned the houses and the city never bothered to research who owned them in their rush to cash in on the headlines while TJ Waconia was still news

John Hoff got the name Johnny Northside and the blog started partially by riding the TJ Waconia same coat tails as the city did and ever since it has been a public battle between John Hoff and myself. I started and maintain the Misadventures of Johnny Northside because, it was clear to me way back that John operated by his own set of rules and double standards. He has made several threats against me that have been well documented on this blog, the Mplsmirror and on the Adventures of Jordan Hawkman.

Which brings us to the topic of this post.

Last year, John sent me several text messages warning me that if I didn't back off of my efforts of reporting all of his current and past misdeeds, threats, attempts to manipulate others (and the list goes on), that he would go after the one thing he knew I cared about... My friend. Part of the reason I have kept up with Johns "adventures" is because of the fact that he has made threats to me before and I have the same policy as the United States does against terrorism... I will not negotiate with John Hoff and I will not stand down to his blackmail attempts.

The text message John sent said that I had "an incredible opportunity to BACK THE HELL OFF" or he would go after Tom and Jon by trying to make their lives as miserable as possible. He promised to write letters to the prison they are located at, the authorities at the prison itself as well as the parole board. He ended the threat by stating, "By the time I am done with them, the entire Balko family will HATE YOU... Now BACK OFF, JIM!"

I didn't back off. John carried out his threat by writing letters to Tom and Jon as well as to the prison, if not more.

I am writing this post to let people know that John Hoff has made good on his threat. He has accomplished his goal. John has effectively driven a wedge between me and my life-long best friend, Tom. I hereby congratulate John Hoff! John can add ending a 30+ year friendship between two people to his list of accomplishments and in doing so, has lost the one effective "weapon" that he has used against me since this all began.

Last fall, I got a call from one of Tom's relatives and they told me that John had been sending letters to both Tom and Jon as well as the prison. They told me that I will not be hearing from Tom in the future and they thanked me for the support I gave him through the entire ordeal.
I have not been contacted by Tom since.

The worst thing John has been able to slander me with in his attempts to discredit and humiliate me in public has been by telling everyone that I am the "self proclaimed best friend of TJ Waconia fraudster, Tom Balko." (the quote is from John that he has used over and over again.)
That's all, though.

John went after my former friend because, he has not been able to find anything about me that he could use to tarnish or ruin me with by blogging about it. Class act, huh?

I made a promise to John that I would not stop my efforts of notifying the public and people John associates with about his shady, two-faced and bullying ways. Now that John has caused my friendship with Tom Balko to end... John has NOTHING he can threaten me with and I will NOT back down from the self proclaimed "800 pound Gorilla" that John has called himself.

If anyone reading this post has had a personal run-in with John or knows about other John Hoff related incidents, please contact me by leaving a message in the comments. Be sure to tell if you want your words to be published or not. Or you can email me.

Question for the Hawthorne Hawkman

Note: The end of this post has been updated. An anonymous commenter on the JNS blog asked Jeff if he had seen this post. Jeff responded on that site rather than here so, I have copied his reply and pasted it here. To avoid any complaints, I am disclosing that he did not post his reply on this site. -Anti Johnny

On the JNS blog, Jeff Skrenes a.k.a. the Hawthorne Hawkman made it a point to highlight the applause that was given in response to the principal owners of TJ Waconia being in prison (even though the story is well past yesterday's news).

So the Mis-Adventures of Johnny Northside is reaching out to Jeff personally to answer the following (or at least offer an opinion).

The city council did such an amazing job of taking a stand against fraud as it has been reported in the case of TJ Waconia. The city filed a civil suit that was announced by Mayor Rybak and a few No-Mi neighborhoods joined that lawsuit as well (Hawthorne was not among them).
1) Can you comment on why the Hawthorne neighborhood did not join in that suit?
2) Can you offer an opinion on how the buyout the city agreed to with SunTrust Mortgage has had an impact on No-Mi?
Note: As part of the settlement between the city and SunTrust, the city bought a slew of properties from SunTrust's REO department that were previously owned by TJ Waconia for a mere 10 to 12% discount. The suit was dismissed soon after. TJ Waconia was not the focus of the suit soon after it was filed because, SunTrust Mortgage was not notified of the law suit prior to it being filed and announced. The significance of that was that SunTrust was actually the legal owners of most of the properties included in the suit as TJ Waconia had already lost them to foreclosure. SunTrust countered the law suit and the city ended up buying many of the houses from SunTrust because of it. It is undetermined how much money the city wasted by pursuing the civil suit and having to buy houses when a simple title search would have disclosed that SunTrust owned the houses and did not need to be put under city control as was reported.
Here is the link to the dismissed case. http://pa.courts.state.mn.us/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=1611672898 And here is the link to the related case that was also dismissed: http://pa.courts.state.mn.us/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=1611685450

It would be interesting to hear the housing director's take on this as he can see first hand at what impact the neighborhoods have had as a result of the city controlling so many houses (as a result of having to over pay for them, costing the taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars if not more).
I hope Jeff will respond as this blog does not pick and choose which comments to allow. His comments are not only allowed but, welcomed.
______________________________

The Hawthorne Hawkman said... @ anon 1:34 - I read that post now, thanks. I will not respond on that particular site because it is entirely dedicated to smearing the name of a good friend and neighborhood advocate. The article posed two questions to me: why wasn't Hawthorne involved in the TJ Waconia suit, and then a second, very technical question.
Hawthorne was not involved in the TJ Waconia lawsuit because there were only a small handful of TJ Waconia properties in the Hawthorne neighborhood. That doesn't mean we weren't affected at all by Helgason's and Balko's fraud; only that the staff and volunteer resources that would have been used up if we'd been a plaintiff would not have brought the neighborhood a large enough return on that investment of time and energy. Plus, as demonstrated by the convictions, the city and the neighborhoods primarily affected clearly didn't need our help on this one.

As for the second question, since I was not involved directly, I will not venture into that territory. Mr. Watkins can ask any of the plaintiffs about that directly if he so chooses, or someone can post an answer here or on another blog.
January 25, 2010 8:57 AM
_______________________

(Anti-Johnny's follow up)
Jeff: First, let me thank you for answering (even though it was not directly on here.
Second, I would be thrilled to ask the 2nd question I posted directly to some of the Plaintiffs as you suggested (I have asked a handful already but, there has been no reply). Which site or forum would be the most appropriate place to ask the question? On a side note, I am wanting to know the answer to that question as it does go way beyond TJ Waconia and the mis-handling of that case. The fact that you did give a response to the question leads me to believe that you agree (at least somewhat) that the events that took place in that case, could very well have a significant effect with the neighborhoods and residents of No-Mi.

--Anti Johnny

The Other Side to Johnny Northside's Invasion into the Helgason House Photo Mission

This post is in response to the post about Jon Helgason's house, written by John Hoff for the Johnny Northside Blog. To read that post, click here http://adventuresofjohnnynorthside.blogspot.com/2009/12/jns-blog-exclusive-while-tj-waconia.html

I will paste some of John's comments and follow with comments of my own.

1. "First, I wanted to publish photos of the spectacular lake home where the family of Jon Helgason still resides"

AJ (Anti-Johnny)- For what purpose? The only person I recall ever asking to see pictures was John Hoff. Since the TJ Waconia case has "fallen off the radar" (from the same post), what was the reason for going to such an extreme to publish pictures?

2. "Second, I would like......mug shots of Helgason and Balko in their new Duluth prison digs."

AJ- Again... Why? If there is a reason OTHER than to attempt to annoy Jim Watkins (which, it doesn't), then what is the purpose?

3. It was a great time to take care of T.J. Waconia Blogger Goal Number One.

AJ- Goal number one? Can John elaborate on this? About the tresspassing, keep reading.

This is what John had to say after he saw the shed on the property.

4. What would you KEEP in a shed that size, I wonder? A recreational vehicle like the "rock star RV" owned by the Koenigs? Snowmobiles, motorcycles, three wheelers and other toys? A workshop to putz around with fun hobbies like, I don't know, maybe classic cars? In any case, the unearned affluence and in-your-face-God gluttony is stomach-turning. While our neighborhood struggles to throw off the cruel yoke of slumlords and their destructive influence, ill-gotten Northside gains appear to flow to exurbia, where a man might be in prison until 2016 but his family still lives like royalty.

AJ- Those comments are very bothersome. John made it clear by explaining all the detail of how he walked & crawled over frozen lake to get his pictures without tresspassing. He wondered what someone could keep in such a big shed and suggested maybe "classic cars" that I highlighted in red. John being the smug, arrogant person that he is, gave himself away with that comment. In other words, he lied about not tresspassing. You see, when I met Jon Helgason in 2003, I learned that he had a small collection of classic cars. Note that it was 2003... BEFORE TJ Waconia began to buy the majority of their properties. Back to the point of John Hoff lying about not tresspassing.
The neighbor that John spoke with knew more than they let on. In fact, they alerted the owner of the house that John Hoff had been there and why. The person currently residing there then went outside to look around. They found footprints all around the house and the property for that matter and they did not appear to be from any kid as the prints were adult sized.
So John lied about not tresspassing and I ask... Why? Why did he have to snoop around? He went on to say that it was one "giant step for journalism" but, how is that exactly?

Also, Helgason bought that house before 2003. John Hoff claimed it was the result of real estate fraud but, he has no idea when the he bought the house.
Further, what is the crime with ANYONE living like royalty? Last I heard, every American has the right to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. Who is John Hoff to question and point a dirty finger at anyone for doing just that?

5. "The value of this property could do much to compensate the victims of the T.J. Waconia fraud. I'm just saying."
AJ- Just saying... What? That is exactly it... He is just saying things that he has no basis to say nor does he have the information to support it.
I say this because, John does not know when the house was bought or how much it cost to buy. John does not know the current value of the property either. He must me equity, right? If that is what he meant, then John is missing the boat on that because, equity is only worth something if you are able to tap into it and convert it to cash. When the market crashes, the equity goes with it. Just ask anyone who bought their house in 2005 or 2006 and ask how much they paid for their house and what it is worth now.
Finally, there is the issue of a MORTGAGE! Did John think the government would have just taken the house and told the lien holder that they are now wiped out so, they could sell the house and get all the profit from it? Nope, John doesn't know what the payoff of the house is nor does he know how much it might sell for if it were on the market.
If all of John's assumptions were in the interest of journalism, I ask again... How?

6. "SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE."
AJ- That is the final sentence in the post by Johnny Northside and I agree completly!
Why a man in his 40's felt the need to go to such extremes so, he could post some pictures on his blog while assuming many things, making claims he had no factual basis for AND tresspassing in order to do it... Is beyond my comprehension.
John Hoff was wrong for doing what he did and I am told the person who lives at that address felt very violated and their privacy was definately invaded.
I am going to go out on a limb here and say that John Hoff had no reason to do what he did and he thought nothing of the rights or personal safety of the person who resides at that address by his actions and follow up post.
I am calling for a public apology to the resident who lives in that house as well as to the general public for doing such a thing and claiming it was a giant step for journalism.
As for the tresspassing, I hope the resident took pictures of the footprints in the snow that were found ON the property as they should be able to be matched with the footprints John Hoff supposedly left in the snow on top of the ice as one of his pictures showed.

The lesson learned from this? I don't know. John Hoff does whatever he wants to do and doesn't care about the effect it might have on anyone else as long as he is able to benefit from it and blog about it. Remember, he wrote two books about Dumpster Diving so, he is very used to digging into other peoples' lives and will use what he finds to his benefit. Think I am joking? Read his second book because, it is chilling to read what he has claimed to do with personal information he has obtained by snooping in people's trash.

TJ Waconia: Minneapolis City Council paid HOW MUCH???

The City Settled Again for HOW MUCH??

The City of Minneapolis held a big press conference to announce a civil suit by going after TJ Waconia and then announce that they won! They told the public that they gained control of TJ Waconia's properties but... OOPS! TJ Waconia no longer owned those properties. SunTrust Mortgage owned them and the city failed to notify them of their lawsuit that they claim to have won. OOPS!
Enter SunTrust Mortgage.
Judge rules in favor of SunTrust but, the city didn't bother to tell the public. Why should they? They didn't bother to tell SunTrust about the lawsuit.
Finally, the city settles with SunTrust. The city buys a bunch of properties owned by SunTrust at a whopping 10% discount!
So... The city screws up. The city ends up buying SunTrusts' bad debt and neglects to tell the public!

Oooh! This hurts all the way around!

The Minneapolis City Council had their case against TJ Waconia dismissed but, it sure cost the tax-payers... A LOT!

HOW much did that lawsuit and settlement (yes, settlement) cost the citizens of Minneapolis? We are still adding up all the "sale prices" the city paid SunTrust Mortgage in the wake of the TJ Waconia fiasco.
Looks like Don Samuels, Barbara Johnson and Mayor R.T. Rybak will have the voters to answer to this time! As R.T. said last year at the press conference that announced the city's suit against TJ Waconia (that was DISMISSED), "This time its personal."

You bet it is!

Now... HOW MUCH did the city pay SunTrust Mortgage to settle???
Stay tuned because, it is A LOT!

Trumped Up Lawsuit: City of Minneapolis, Folwell, McKinley & Webber-Camden VS. T.J. Waconia... DISMISSED

Bogus Lawsuit Against TJ Waconia: DISMISSED!

Don Samuels - Minneapolis City Council

As a defender of TJ Waconia and knowing first-hand that the entire case was nothing more than a cruel stunt by the Minneapolis City Council (Barbara Johnson and Don Samuels) to grandstand on the publicity that was focused on TJ Waconia. The civil suit made the headlines and even Mayor R.T. Rybak got his share of publicity from the deal. They claimed they won when they gained control of the 160 TJ Waconia properties and were hard at work with the houses. The only problem is, TJ Waconia no longer owned those properties. SunTrust Mortgage did and they were not happy about NOT BEING NOTIFIED of the BS lawsuit the city had filed against TJ Waconia. The city's attorneys never bothered to do a proper title search on those houses because, that would simply cost too much money. Instead, they utilized the out-dated Hennepin County website that had not updated the database to say that TJ Waconia no longer owned the houses.
OOOPS!
How much money did THAT cost the taxpayers?

Any member of the media or candidates running for City Council or Mayor of Minneapolis, I offer you the following:
I have copies of the intervention SunTrust Mortgage filed against the City of Minneapolis which clearly details (.pdf file format) how the laywers for the Plaintiffs acted and proceeded without doing proper research and the result of which has cost the taxpayers of Minneapolis hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees.
I am happy to share all documents and files related to this case with you. All documents were sent to me by one of the principal owners of TJ Waconia.
You my contact me at: thedfwmentor@aol.com (Jim Watkins)
Note: Minneapolis StarTribune writer Steve Brandt was contacted about this and was also told about how Minneapolis City Council President, Barbara Johnson perjured herself at the federal sentencing hearing. Mr. Brandt declined to pursue this story. Because of this refusal to report such neglect and mis-use of funds by the city council, I will not release any information or documents to the Minneapolis StarTribune.

_________________________________________

Here is the Register of Actions with the dismissed case.
Source: http://pa.courts.state.mn.us/

Register of ActionsCase No. 27-CV-08-7880City of Minneapolis; Family Housing Fund; Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation; Folwell Neighborhood Association; McKinley Community; Webber-Camden Neighborhood Association; Joel Breeggemann; and Elandria Gilchrist vs TJ Waconia LLC; Thomas Balko; Jon Helgason; TJ Holdings LLC; Total Title LLC; Absolute Appraisal LLC; and CityWide Management LLC
Case Type: Civil Other/Misc.
Date Filed: 04/02/2008
Location: - Hennepin Civil
Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A.

Related Case InformationRelated Cases
27-CV-HC-08-2728 (Companion Case)

Party Information Lead Attorneys

Defendant Absolute Appraisal LLC
Rogers, MN 55374
SKOLNICK, WILLIAM RESS          Retained

Defendant Balko, Thomas
Duluth, MN 55184
SKOLNICK, WILLIAM RESS          Retained

Defendant CityWide Management LLC
Roseville, MN 55113
SKOLNICK, WILLIAM RESS          Retained
Defendant Helgason, Jon
Chisago City, MN 55013
SKOLNICK, WILLIAM RESS          Retained

Defendant TJ Holdings LLC
Roseville, MN 55113
SKOLNICK, WILLIAM RESS          Retained

Defendant TJ Waconia LLC
Roseville, MN 55113
SKOLNICK, WILLIAM RESS          Retained

Defendant Total Title LLC
Roseville, MN 55113
SKOLNICK, WILLIAM RESS          Retained

Intervenor SunTrust Mortgage Inc
PRATTE, ROBERT J                       Retained


Plaintiff Breeggemann, Joel
YEAGER, MARY CULLEN               Retained

Plaintiff City of Minneapolis
Minnepaolis, MN 55402
GINDER, PETER W                         Retained

Plaintiff FAMILY HOUSING FUND
YEAGER, MARY CULLEN               Retained

Plaintiff Folwell Neighborhood Association
YEAGER, MARY CULLEN               Retained

Plaintiff Gilchrist, Elandria
YEAGER, MARY CULLEN                Retained

Plaintiff GREATER METROPOLITAN HOUSING CORPORATION
YEAGER, MARY CULLEN                Retained

Plaintiff McKinley Community
YEAGER, MARY CULLEN                Retained

Plaintiff Webber-Camden Neighborhood Association
YEAGER, MARY CULLEN                Retained

____________________________________________
Events & Orders of the Court DISPOSITIONS


08/20/2009 CANCELED Hearing (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.)

Dismissed


OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS

04/02/2008 Summons and Complaint

04/02/2008 Certificate of Representation

04/02/2008 Affidavit-Other

04/02/2008 Other Document

04/02/2008 Other Document

04/07/2008 Notice of Case Assignment (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

04/16/2008 Hearing (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.) Result: Held

04/16/2008 Stipulation

04/16/2008 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

04/17/2008 Stipulation and Order

04/29/2008 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

05/08/2008 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

05/08/2008 Notice of Motion and Motion

05/12/2008 Notice of Motion and Motion

05/12/2008 Memorandum

05/12/2008 Affidavit-Other

05/14/2008 Affidavit-Other

05/15/2008 Hearing (3:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.) Result: Held

05/16/2008 Motion Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.) 05/13/2008 Reset by Court to 05/16/2008

05/29/2008 Reset by Court to 05/13/2008

Result: Held

05/16/2008 Other Document

05/16/2008 Affidavit-Other

05/16/2008 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

05/30/2008 Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.) Result: Held

05/30/2008 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

06/02/2008 Taken Under Advisement (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

06/02/2008 Memorandum

06/12/2008 Fnd of Fact Conclusions of Law; Order for Judg and Judg (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

06/13/2008 Non-Docketed Judgment Entered

06/13/2008 Notice of Entry of Judgment

06/18/2008 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

06/20/2008 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

06/23/2008 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

06/24/2008 Telephone Motion Hearing (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.) Result: Held

06/26/2008 Notice of Motion and Motion

06/30/2008 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

07/07/2008 Memorandum

07/07/2008 Affidavit-Other

07/11/2008 Memorandum

07/11/2008 Notice of Hearing

07/11/2008 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

07/14/2008 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

07/14/2008 Informational Statement

07/14/2008 Agreement

07/15/2008 Affidavit-Other

07/16/2008 Affidavit-Other

07/16/2008 Memorandum

07/16/2008 Affidavit-Other

07/17/2008 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.) 07/18/2008 Reset by Court to 07/17/2008

Result: Held

07/17/2008 Affidavit-Other

07/17/2008 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

07/17/2008 Order for Trial (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

07/17/2008 Scheduling Order (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

07/21/2008 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

07/21/2008 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

07/23/2008 Notice of Motion and Affidavit

07/23/2008 Memorandum

07/28/2008 Motion Hearing (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.) Result: Held

07/31/2008 Affidavit-Other

07/31/2008 Notice of Appeal

08/01/2008 Summons

08/01/2008 Complaint-Civil

08/01/2008 Memorandum

08/01/2008 Affidavit-Other

08/04/2008 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

08/04/2008 Affidavit-Other

08/04/2008 Memorandum

08/04/2008 Affidavit-Other

08/05/2008 Taken Under Advisement (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

08/08/2008 CANCELED Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.)

Other
08/11/2008 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

08/12/2008 Notice of Case Filing

08/12/2008 Notice of Case Filing

08/19/2008 CANCELED Hearing (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.)

Other

08/08/2008 Reset by Court to 08/19/2008
08/19/2008 Other Document

08/20/2008 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )

08/22/2008 Transcript

09/11/2008 Notice of Appeal

09/17/2008 Notice of Case Filing

10/29/2008 Stipulation and Order for Dismissal (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

10/29/2008 Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice

10/29/2008 Notice of Entry of Judgment

11/03/2008 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )

12/15/2008 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

01/09/2009 Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.) Result: Held

01/13/2009 Notice of Motion and Motion

01/13/2009 Other Document

01/14/2009 Hearing (1:45 PM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.) Result: Held

01/15/2009 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

01/26/2009 Scheduling Order (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

02/03/2009 CANCELED Jury Trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.)

Other
02/17/2009 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

02/17/2009 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

03/24/2009 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

03/31/2009 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

04/02/2009 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

04/08/2009 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

04/10/2009 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

04/10/2009 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

04/17/2009 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

04/24/2009 Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.) Result: Held

04/24/2009 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

05/07/2009 Correspondence (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

05/13/2009 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

05/13/2009 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

05/20/2009 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

06/09/2009 Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.) Result: Held

06/15/2009 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Blaeser, Robert A. )

06/15/2009 Non-Docketed Judgment Entered

06/15/2009 Notice of Entry of Judgment

08/20/2009 CANCELED Hearing (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Blaeser, Robert A.)

Dismissed